More than the addition of ice, the scenery, in general, feels different. Still, this change really helps stand this apart from the original. You'll find yourself on land far more than you did in the original Subnautica, though this doesn't mean you're on land - or ice - for a long period of time. This is a different part of 4546B, a freezing part (below zero degrees celsius.
Returning to 4546B, you pretty much know what you're getting into.
So how does Subnautica: Below Zero let itself stand apart? It also helps that Subnautica had a genuinely interesting story. This was a setting hand-crafted by the developers and not procedurally generated. Subnautica offered a different setting, one oozing with atmosphere, offering a new terrifying or beautiful, sometimes both, discovery around almost every corner. Subnautica was one such game, and now I'm playing Subnautica: Below Zero.įrancesco reviewed it back in the day, but I generally stand by what was said. I stand by that statement, though there are always games that stand out as worth playing, despite my general apathy to the subgenre. I was more than open in the fact that survival games, in general, leave me feeling quite tepid, or specifically, I stated, "survival games became the next realistic shooters and are now being supplanted by open-world as the go-to thing for the terminally uninspired". One week ago, I wrote down my feelings for a different survival game in my early access preview of Valheim.
0 kommentar(er)
